Aldo Leopold Legacy Center


Baraboo, WI


Content Type
  • Building
Building type
Commercial office
Building type
Interpretive Center
Floor Area (ft2)
Floor Area (m2)
Date of Occupancy/ Completion
Annual Water Use (gal/ft2)
Annual Water Use (L/m2)
Annual Energy Generated (kBtu/ft2)
Annual Energy Generated (MJ/m2)
Annual Purchased Energy (kBtu/ft2)
Annual Energy Cost ($US/ft2)
Annual Purchased Energy (MJ/m2)
Annual Energy Cost ($US/m2)
Total Project Cost (land excluded)($US)
Certifications & Awards
  • LEED-NC v.2/v.2.1 in 2007 achievement level Platinum (61 points)
  • Zero Energy Building
Project Team
  • Owner: The Aldo Leopold Foundation Inc.


Published in 1949 as the finale to A Sand County Almanac, Aldo Leopold's "Land Ethic" set the stage for the modern conservation movement. Leopold's philosophy included the belief that the idea of community should be enlarged to include, in his words, "collectively: the land." This includes nonhuman elements such as soils, waters, plants, and animals.

**This building was originally imported from the U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Database ( on 2009-06-06. Please confirm that the import was successful, login, and remove this message. Help make the Green Building Brain better.**


  • Location: Baraboo, WI
  • Climate Region: 6A: Cold - Humid
  • Building type(s): Interpretive Center, Commercial office
  • New construction
  • 11,900 sq. feet (1,100 sq. meters)
  • Project scope: 3 1-story buildings
  • Rural setting
  • Completed April 2007
  • Rating: U.S. Green Building Council LEED-NC, v.2/v.2.1--Level: Platinum (61 points)
    Rating: Zero Energy Building

Published in 1949 as the finale to A Sand County Almanac, Aldo Leopold's "Land Ethic" set the stage for the modern conservation movement. Leopold's philosophy included the belief that the idea of community should be enlarged to include, in his words, "collectively: the land." This includes nonhuman elements such as soils, waters, plants, and animals.

The headquarters for the Aldo Leopold Foundation, the Legacy Center includes office and meeting spaces, an interpretive hall, an archive, and a workshop organized around a central courtyard. Built where Leopold died fighting a brush fire in 1948, the Legacy Center also provides a trailhead to the original Leopold Shack.

Environmental Aspects

The Foundation located the project on a previously disturbed site, which it is restoring to native ecosystems. The project team used crushed gravel in place of blacktop or concrete paving, increasing rainwater infiltration and blending the developed areas into the surrounding landscape.

The native landscaping requires no irrigation. Waterless urinals, dual-flush toilets, and efficient faucets reduce water consumption by 65%. An on-site well provides potable water, and an existing septic system treats wastewater.

Thinning the Leopold forests improved forest health while providing 90,000 board feet of wood for use in the project. More than 75% of all wood used in the project was certified to Forest Stewardship Council standards, and 60% of all materials were manufactured within 500 miles of the project site.

The Legacy Center was designed to use 70% less energy than a comparable conventional building. A 39.6-kW rooftop photovoltaic array produces more than 110% of the project's annual electricity needs. This excess renewable energy, along with on-site carbon sequestration, offsets the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the project's operations.

Daylighting eliminates the need for electric lighting during most of the day. Ground-source heat pumps connected to a radiant slab provide heating and cooling, and an earth-tube system provides tempered fresh air.

Owner & Occupancy

  • Owned and occupied by The Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc., Corporation, nonprofit

  • Typically occupied by 12 people, 40 hours per person per week; and 85 visitors per week, 5 hours per visitor per week


Integrated team, Green framework, Simulation, Green specifications, Commissioning, Performance measurement and verification, Operations and maintenance, Wildlife habitat, Indigenous vegetation, Efficient fixtures and appliances, Drought-tolerant landscaping, Massing and orientation, Insulation levels, Glazing, Airtightness, Passive solar, HVAC, Lighting control and daylight harvesting, Efficient lighting, On-site renewable electricity, Durability, Benign materials, Salvaged materials, Recycled materials, Local materials, Certified wood, C&D waste management, Occupant recycling, Connection to outdoors, Daylighting, Natural ventilation, Ventilation effectiveness, Moisture control, Low-emitting materials

Team & Process

The goal for this project was to demonstrate how human activity, the built environment, and the natural world are intertwined in a larger cycle of energy and life. Perhaps the most lasting achievement of the Legacy Center will be its strict adherence to a holistic design process consistent with Leopold's understanding of ecological systems, a process that offers the promise of shared benefit for both human inhabitants and the land.

At the project outset, Aldo Leopold’s daughter Nina expressed her desire for a facility that would introduce visitors to a particular quality of understanding. To illustrate her meaning, she described the typical tourist center, which briefly entertains visitors in a “high-volume, low-intensity” experience. Nina's vision, in contrast, was to encourage a “low-volume, high-intensity” experience. She wanted to create a place that would engage visitors more deeply, a place that would afford each individual the means to fully consider what Leopold described as the “Land Ethic.”

The design team took inspiration from the Shack, where Leopold did much of his writing, but did not seek to copy it. Perhaps most influential was Nina’s comment that "the Shack was everything, and it was nothing,” which the architects understood to mean that, while the Shack served as an outpost for the family’s restoration efforts, the physical nature of the building was less important than the work that took place there. The architects concluded that the end-all of the Leopold legacy could never be a building. That approach would quietly emphasize a mechanical solution over ecological wisdom. Thus, the design efforts strove to shift the focus from the buildings themselves to the spaces and the activities associated with them.

The design team balanced new technologies with time-tested strategies. By relying too much on technology, architecture risks losing historic knowledge about how to create comfortable, durable buildings with low-tech, low-energy—but highly intelligent—solutions developed over generations. The Legacy Center was designed to combine both approaches in a beautiful and functional space.

From the start of the schematic design phase through construction, project-team meetings included the environmental consultant, energy-simulation consultant, commissioning agent, and control-system consultant.

The ambitious nature of this effort required the project team to rethink traditional approaches to design and construction. In typical projects, the architect typically designs without regard to the availability of materials or the impact of their use. Building plans are drawn in isolation, and then a list of component parts—structural elements, flooring, walls, and roofing—are ordered from a factory somewhere and delivered to the construction site for assembly. In its traditional form, architectural design is a linear process with little regard for constraints other than economics or style.

For this project, the team chose another path. The decision to harvest trees planted by the Leopold family presented a complex and inverted design challenge. To put the finite quantity of this precious resource to the best use, the design team had to work backward, matching the building to the available resources. The use of Leopold wood is the most visible, and perhaps the most symbolic, of the team's efforts to design within the resources available on site, including sun, earth, and water. The result was a design process that fully considered the true ecological costs of the materials and resources used for construction as well as those that would be required to operate the building.

The team designed the building-control systems to include alarms for malfunctions or system operations outside the accepted ranges.

The project's heat pumps, radiant floor pumps, and air-handling units are turned off when staff places the system in natural-ventilation mode. The sequence of operation integrates staff control of systems through a Web-based controls interface. The Foundation has entered into a maintenance contract with mechanical and controls contractors who have online access to the controls system to respond to operational issues and tweak control settings as necessary.

The commissioning agent interviewed all consultants and subcontractors before they were hired to ensure they understood and agreed to work within the requirements of constructing a high-performance building that would meet the highest levels of LEED certification.

The contracting team spent two weeks performing its own systems commissioning in preparation for the commissioning agent’s visit. The commissioning agent will review performance at the end of the first year of occupancy to ensure that systems are performing as designed.

The ongoing monitoring of building systems and performance is a priority. The commissioning agent is currently engaged in measurement and verification, and the environmental consultant agreed to spend the 2008 academic year in residence at the Legacy Center measuring performance and observing staff interaction with the building.

A large number of building and site sensors allow significant data feedback. An on-site weather station; multiple relative humidity, dewpoint, and carbon dioxide sensors; load submeters; and flow meters will allow for subsystem performance evaluation and adjustments. The controls-system consultant developed an archived database of all control and measurement points in the system.

Staff have implemented accounting methods for gasoline use, air travel, and firewood use to provide annual estimates of carbon emissions. The Foundation's staff ecologist will work with the environmental consultant to measure the carbon sequestered in forested lands. Photographs of the forest taken prior to the harvest established a visual baseline, and monitoring points throughout the stands will record changes in forest growth and health over time.

Joel Krueger The Kubala Washatko Architects, Inc. Architect Cedarburg, WI [](
Allen Washatko The Kubala Washatko Architects, Inc. Architect Cedarburg, WI [](
Tom Kubala The Kubala Washatko Architects, Inc. Architect Cedarburg, WI [](
Mike Utzinger University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Architecture Environmental building consultant Milwaukee, WI [](
[Buddy Huffaker](learnmore.cfm?ProjectID=946) The Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc. Owner/developer (Executive director) Baraboo, WI [](
Steve Swenson The Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc. Ecologist and timber harvesting expert Baraboo, WI [](
Theresa Lehman The Boldt Company LEED consultant Appleton, WI [](
The Boldt Company Contractor Appleton, WI [](
Ron Perkins Supersymmetry USA, Inc. Commissioning agent Navasota, TX
David Bradley Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC Energy consultant Madison, WI [](
Fred Bachmann Bachmann Construction Co., Inc. Carpentry contractor Madison, WI [](
Andrew Bangert H & H Group, Inc. Photovoltaic contractor Madison, WI [](
Brady Farrell H & H Group, Inc. Mechanical contractor Madison, WI [](
Chip Plummer H & H Group, Inc. Electrical contractor Madison, WI [](
Bob Hines Hines & Co., LLC System controls consultant Winston-Salem, NC [](
Bob Gilomen KompGilomen Engineering, Inc. Structural engineer Milwaukee, WI
Bob Eliopolous Matrix Mechanical Solutions, LLC Mechanical and plumbing engineer Greenfield, WI [](
Tom Pfefferkorn Powrtek Engineering, Inc. Electrical engineer Waukesha, WI [](
Mark Schoeff Schadde Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Plumbing contractor Baraboo, WI
Missy Inoue Landscape architect Chicago, Il
Marcy Hufaker The Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc. Landscape architect Baraboo, WI [](

Finance & Cost

The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center was funded largely through the multiyear, $6.9 million "Land Ethic Campaign" capital fundraising effort. In addition to providing construction funds, the Land Ethic Campaign proceeds will help restore and protect the historic Leopold Shack, preserve and maintain the Leopold archives, and establish an endowment fund. The Kresge Foundation provided a $300,000 challenge grant and a $50,000 green building planning grant. The architectural team provided conceptual fundraising materials and gave presentations at donor events.

The Foundation received many generous financial gifts, but it is hard to place a value on the gift of sweat equity given by volunteers to strip bark from Leopold pines. This effort and other acts of generosity contributed to the success of the building. The site-harvested lumber had a market value conservatively estimated at $250,000, more than 70% of the value of all lumber used in the project.

Cost data in U.S. dollars as of date of completion.

  • Total project cost (land excluded): $3,943,418

Early detailed cost estimating was essential for the successful integration of the green design concepts and was achieved by engaging the services of a qualified construction manager from the project outset.

During the course of this project, the design team was often asked about the payback period for green features. Economic calculations are necessary for any construction project, but from the outset the Foundation defined payback broadly. The Foundation wanted to take full responsibility for the environmental as well as the economic costs of construction. This distinction cuts to the essence of Leopold’s Land Ethic. Leopold argued that purely economic motives, as they are commonly understood in modern life, were not sufficient to preserve the long-term health and stability of the biotic community. He wrote that “a system of conservation based solely on economic self-interest is hopelessly lopsided. It tends to ignore, and thus eventually eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack commercial value, but that are essential to its healthy functioning.”

The single largest energy investment in this project was the solar photovoltaic system, which cost $240,000. Over its 25-year projected lifetime, the system should produce more than five times the embodied energy used to manufacture it. Simple economic payback is relative to local economic incentives. In this case, the simple payback based on first cost and local electricity rates is 97 years; in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, however, the same system would have a simple payback of 14 years. But in either case the environmental cost is the same. The decision to install the system reflects the Foundation's clear commitment to achieve a net-zero, carbon-neutral building.

Land Use & Community

The Aldo Leopold Foundation viewed the construction of the Legacy Center as an opportunity to continue a 70-year tradition of land stewardship. While the Leopold Shack became a metaphor for living lightly on the land, it is the land itself and the Leopold family’s efforts to restore it that truly informed and inspired Leopold’s observations and writing.

The Legacy Center was built on a previously disturbed site that reinforces the historic connection to the Shack and marks the location of Leopold’s death. The rural setting is essential to the Foundation's mission, which is to engage people in the process of ethical land management.

Education and community outreach was a central theme of the project: the Foundation held field days during the winter tree harvest, volunteers stripped bark from logs, local craftspeople designed furniture and building details, a local sawmill operator worked on the site, and the Foundation sponsored renewable energy workshops and building tours throughout construction. In its first year of operation, the Legacy Center hosted more than 5,500 visitors.

Most visitors arrive in groups by van or carpool. The parking area was designed to accommodate average, not peak, use. Because the Foundation headquarters moved from the nearby town of Baraboo to a rural area, the project team included staff commuting in the Legacy Center's carbon analysis. The Foundation purchased adjacent real estate to house interns and visiting researchers.

  • Support for Appropriate Transportation

    • Design development to have pedestrian emphasis rather than automobile emphasis

    • Provide showers and changing areas for bicycle and pedestrian commuters

    • Provide storage area for bicycles

Site Description

As part of restoration efforts during the 1930s and 1940s, the Leopold family planted thousands of trees on their worn-out Sand County farm. Seventy years later, the forested areas on the 1,500-acre Leopold Memorial Reserve were overcrowded, resulting in poor canopy development and an extremely low annual growth rate.

Research determined that careful thinning could improve forest health, increasing carbon sequestration and increasing the potential for the remaining trees to live 150 years. This thinning process provided a raw material for the project and gave the Foundation a way to honor the symbolic importance of the Leopold pines. The quantity and nature of the wood made available from the thinning shaped the building design and provided an example of responsible land management.

The building was located on a previously disturbed site on the Leopold Reserve. As part of a continuing effort, the Foundation is restoring the site perimeter to the appropriate ecological communities of prairie, savanna, and wetland. Collaboration with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other organizations make the site a demonstration center for ecological restoration and native landscaping.

All rainwater is managed on site. The site's geology, including more than 300 feet of sand, encourages natural percolation of rainwater. The project team minimized impervious areas by using crushed gravel in lieu of blacktop or concrete paving, increasing rainwater infiltration and blending the developed areas into the surrounding landscape. Rainwater captured from the roof is funneled through an aqueduct into a rain garden planted with native species before it filters back into the aquifer. The team designed parking pockets with shaded areas to reduce the project's contribution to the urban heat-island effect and designed parking areas and roadways to circulate around existing trees.

  • Lot size: 11.41 acres
  • Previously developed land

Water Conservation and Use

The site does not have a permanent irrigation system. Waterless urinals, dual-flush toilets, and water conserving lavatories reduce water consumption by 65%, compared with a typical building. An on-site well provides potable water, and an existing septic system treats wastewater.

Water Use -

Indoor potable water use: 40,500 gal/yr (153,000 liters/yr)
  • Outdoor potable water use: 0 gal/yr (0 liters/yr)
  • Total potable water use: 40,500 gal/yr (153,000 liters/yr)
  • Potable water use per unit area: 3.41 gal/sq ft (139 liters/sq meter)

  • Development Impacts

    • Cluster buildings to preserve open space and protect habitat
    • Minimize development impact area
    • Limit parking area
  • Ecosystem Restoration

    • Remove ecologically damaging non-native (invasive) species
  • Waterless Fixtures

    • Specify waterless urinals
  • Landscape Plantings

    • Landscape with indigenous vegetation
    • Plant trees to shade parked vehicles
  • Low-Water-Use Fixtures

    • Use low-flow toilets
  • Integration with Site Resources

    • Celebrate and enhance existing landscape features
  • Site Planning

    • Protect and celebrate a site’s uniqueness


The project team aimed to maximize the amount of time that the project can be operated without lighting and mechanical systems.

The main building's long, narrow footprint, oriented along an east-west axis, allows all occupied spaces to be daylit and naturally ventilated. Building overhangs shield sun in the summer and allow passive heat gain in the winter. A south-facing, minimally conditioned thermal flux zone provides an acoustical buffer between public and staff areas and allows staff members to manage natural ventilation, solar gain, and glare.

A highly efficient building envelope reduces thermal transfer. The use of structural insulated panels in place of frame construction greatly increased the insulation value of the walls. Overall, insulation values for almost every part of the building envelope are at least twice the values required by state code.

Ground-source water-to-water heat pumps maintain a 500-gallon tank at 110°F in winter and 45°F in summer. Water from the tank is pumped to radiant slabs for space heating and cooling. Wood-burning stoves provide spot heating and passive survivability in the event of a power outage. The conference wing is mechanically separate from the main building, reducing energy loads.

An earth-tube system provides 100% fresh, tempered air in all seasons. The air-handling unit delivers only required ventilation air, reducing fan sizes by 80% compared with typical systems. Displacement ventilation, variable-frequency-drive fans, and demand-controlled ventilation reduce energy demand.

The project's modeled energy demand is 54,229 kWh per year, and the 39.6-kW photovoltaic array provides 61,250 kWh of electricity per year. The Foundation was anticipated to sell 34,341 kWh to the electric utility and to purchase 26,180 kWh from the utility each year.

A carbon balance based on the World Resources Institute's Greenhouse Gas Protocol indicates that the project emits 13.63 tons of carbon, offsets 6.24 tons of carbon, and sequesters 8.75 tons of carbon in managed forests each year. These values balance out to a net offset and sequestration of 1.36 tons of carbon per year.


Materials & Resources

Approximately 90,000 board feet of site-harvested lumber was milled and dried locally for window frames, doors, siding, flooring, paneling, and artisan-crafted furniture. Pine trees were debarked on-site, air-dried, and used to construct innovative round-wood rafters and trusses. Nearly all of the Legacy Center’s timber skeleton was built with Leopold pines. The Leopold Foundation secured Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) chain-of-custody certification for its own wood through the Smartwood certification body. Measured by value, 78% of all wood used in the project is FSC certified.

Materials with recycled content were used throughout the project. The roof includes high levels of recycled aluminum, for example, and the concrete has flyash in place of much of the portland cement. The rainwater aqueduct and fireplace were made of stone reclaimed from an airplane hanger built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s. The project team also preferred local and regional materials; interior walls were plastered with local sand, clay, and straw, and 60% of all materials, by cost, were manufactured within 500 miles of the project site.

The Aldo Leopold Foundation used waste pulp from the harvested Leopold pines to print a special edition of A Sand County Almanac on archival-quality paper made through an experimental pulping process that used no chlorine or sulfur.

Measured by weight, 95% of construction waste was recycled.

  • Low-VOC Acrylic Latex Interior Paint
  • Photovoltaic Collectors
  • Recycled-Content Cellulose Insulation
  • Structural Insulated Panels
  • Urea-Formaldehyde-Free Particleboard
  • Waterless Urinals
  • Zero-VOC and Low-VOC Interior Paints

The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center was designed to last at least 100 years. Every design decision was made with a view toward the long term. The project was designed to fit within its ecological landscape, using materials that will age gracefully over time. The main building's simple, stable shell is constructed of durable materials. The anticipated service lifetime of the aluminum roof exceeds that of other roofing options. Roof overhangs keep water off exterior walls and windows, improving durability.

Leaving the project's structure exposed in interior spaces reduced the need for finish materials, enhancing durability and reducing maintenance needs. Common spaces were designed to be flexible and easy to modify. Office dimensions were kept to a minimum, reducing the ratio of private space to common space. The mechanical room was sized to accommodate maintenance and future retrofits. The use of copper piping in the mechanical room should extend the life of the piping system.

  • Reusable Components

    • Use materials with integral finish
  • Design for Materials Use Reduction

    • Cluster buildings to minimize infrastructure requirements
    • Consider the use of structural materials that do not require application of finish layers

  • Plan for Materials Longevity

    • Control rainwater flowing on building surfaces
  • Materials and Wildlife Habitat

    • Use wood products from independently certified, well-managed forests for rough carpentry

    • Specify wood flooring from independently certified forestry operations

    • Use wood products from independently certified, well-managed forests for finish carpentry

  • Transportation of Materials

    • Prefer materials that are sourced and manufactured within the local area

Indoor Environment

The Legacy Center's main building is an all-perimeter space oriented along an east-west axis to maximize daylight penetration and to allow strategic placement of operable windows for cross ventilation and passive heating and cooling. Daylight levels provide sufficient general illumination during most periods of the day. Light enters the building from two directions, providing balanced natural light. All work areas have direct views to the outdoors, and all work stations include task lighting.

The project team selected all adhesives, sealants, paints, and composite-wood products for their low chemical emissions. Displacement ventilation provides fresh air that has been preconditioned by an earth-tube system. An ultraviolet filter located between the earth tubes and the air-handling unit controls mold and bacteria. All building areas except the basement mechanical room can be naturally ventilated in appropriate weather. The radiant floor provides heating in winter and cooling in summer. Staff determine whether the building is operated in natural-ventilation, heating, or cooling mode.

  • Visual Comfort and The Building Envelope

    • Orient the floor plan on an east-west axis for best control of daylighting

    • Use large exterior windows and high ceilings to increase daylighting

    • Use skylights and/or clerestories for daylighting
  • Visual Comfort and Interior Design

    • Design open floor plans to allow exterior daylight to penetrate to the interior

    • Install large interior windows to allow for the transmission of daylight

  • Ventilation and Filtration Systems

    • Provide occupants with access to operable windows
  • Above Grade Rainwater and Groundwater

    • Use rooftop rainwater collection system to divert water from the building

  • Above Grade Humidity and Condensation

    • Design building envelope to avoid thermal bridging
  • Building Commissioning for IEQ

    • Use a comprehensive commissioning process to ensure that design intent is realized

  • Maintenance for IEQ

    • Design for easy access to HVAC components


  • Wisconsin Sustainability & Energy Efficiency Awards in 2007;  Category/title: Award of Excellence

  • Forest Stewardship Council in 2007;  Category/title: Designing and Building with FSC Award

  • AIA/COTE Top Ten Green Projects in 2008
  • International Masonry Institute in 2007;  Category/title: Golden Trowel Award. Sustainable Use of Masonry – Best in Category


  • U.S. Green Building Council LEED-NC, v.2/v.2.1 in 2007;  achievement level: Platinum (61 points)

    • Sustainable Sites, 12 of 14 possible points

      • SS Prerequisite 1, Erosion & Sedimentation Control
      • SS Credit 1, Site Selection
      • SS Credit 3, Brownfield Redevelopment
      • SS Credit 4.2, Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms

      • SS Credit 4.3, Alternative Transportation, Alternative Fuel Refueling Stations

      • SS Credit 4.4, Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity
      • SS Credit 5.1, Reduced Site Disturbance, Protect or Restore Open Space

      • SS Credit 5.2, Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint
      • SS Credit 6.1, Stormwater Management, Rate and Quantity
      • SS Credit 6.2, Stormwater Management, Treatment
      • SS Credit 7.1, Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Non-Roof

      • SS Credit 7.2, Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Roof

      • SS Credit 8, Light Pollution Reduction
    • Water Efficiency, 5 of 5 possible points

      • WE Credit 1.1, Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50%
      • WE Credit 1.2, Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Water Use or No Irrigation

      • WE Credit 2, Innovative Wastewater Technologies
      • WE Credit 3.1, Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction
      • WE Credit 3.2, Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction
    • Energy and Atmosphere, 17 of 17 possible points

      • EA Prerequisite 1, Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning
      • EA Prerequisite 2, Minimum Energy Performance
      • EA Prerequisite 3, CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment
      • EA Credit 1.1a, Optimize Energy Performance, 15% New 5% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.1b, Optimize Energy Performance, 20% New 10% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.2a, Optimize Energy Performance, 25% New 15% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.2b, Optimize Energy Performance, 30% New 20% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.3a, Optimize Energy Performance, 35% New 25% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.3b, Optimize Energy Performance, 40% New 30% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.4a, Optimize Energy Performance, 45% New 35% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.4b, Optimize Energy Performance, 50% New 40% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.5a, Optimize Energy Performance, 55% New 45% Existing

      • EA Credit 1.5b, Optimize Energy Performance, 60% New 50% Existing

      • EA Credit 2.1, Renewable Energy, 5%
      • EA Credit 2.2, Renewable Energy, 10%
      • EA Credit 2.3, Renewable Energy, 20%
      • EA Credit 3, Additional Commissioning
      • EA Credit 4, Ozone Depletion
      • EA Credit 5, Measurement and Verification
      • EA Credit 6, Green Power
    • Materials and Resources, 7 of 13 possible points

      • MR Prerequisite 1, Storage & Collection of Recyclables
      • MR Credit 2.1, Construction Waste Management, Divert 50%
      • MR Credit 2.2, Construction Waste Management, Divert 75%
      • MR Credit 4.1, Recycled Content: 5% (post-consumer + 1/2 post-industrial)

      • MR Credit 4.2, Recycled Content: 10% (post-consumer + 1/2 post-industrial)

      • MR Credit 5.1, Local/Regional Materials, 20% Manufactured Locally

      • MR Credit 5.2, Local/Regional Materials, of 20% Above, 50% Harvested Locally

      • MR Credit 7, Certified Wood
    • Indoor Environmental Quality, 15 of 15 possible points

      • EQ Prerequisite 1, Minimum IAQ Performance
      • EQ Prerequisite 2, Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
      • EQ Credit 1, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring
      • EQ Credit 2, Increase Ventilation Effectiveness
      • EQ Credit 3.1, Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction

      • EQ Credit 3.2, Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy

      • EQ Credit 4.1, Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants
      • EQ Credit 4.2, Low-Emitting Materials, Paints
      • EQ Credit 4.3, Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet
      • EQ Credit 4.4, Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood
      • EQ Credit 5, Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control
      • EQ Credit 6.1, Controllability of Systems, Perimeter
      • EQ Credit 6.2, Controllability of Systems, Non-Perimeter
      • EQ Credit 7.1, Thermal Comfort, Comply with ASHRAE 55-1992
      • EQ Credit 7.2, Thermal Comfort, Permanent Monitoring System
      • EQ Credit 8.1, Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces
      • EQ Credit 8.2, Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces
    • Innovation and Design Process, 5 of 5 possible points

      • ID Credit 1.1, Innovation in Design "Exemplary Performance, EAc6"

      • ID Credit 1.2, Innovation in Design "Exemplary Performance, EAc2"

      • ID Credit 1.3, Innovation in Design "Carbon Neutral Building Operation"

      • ID Credit 1.4, Innovation in Design "Exemplary Performance, MRc5.1"

      • ID Credit 2, LEED® Accredited Professional

    The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center earned 61 points in LEED-NC, breaking the record for most points scored. The Legacy Center was also the first building to earn a LEED innovation point for carbon-neutral operations.

  • Zero Energy Building

    • Energy and Atmosphere, 0 of 0 possible points

      • Net Zero Site Energy, Building produces at least as much energy as it uses in a year, when accounted for at the site.

      • Net Zero Source Energy, Building produces at least as much energy as it uses in a year, when accounted for at the source.

      • Net Zero Energy Emissions, Building produces at least as much emissions-free renewable energy as it uses from emission-producing energy sources annually.

    The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center is a carbon-neutral, net zero energy building (ZEB). Because of the efficient building techniques used, the Legacy Center requires very little energy. The Legacy Center’s 39.6-kW rooftop photovoltaic (PV) array produces roughly 10% more than the energy needed to operate the building over the course of a year.

Lessons Learned

Although the availability of Leopold wood presented an extraordinary opportunity unlikely to be repeated in other projects, the process through which the project team engaged in the design of this facility is replicable and holds lessons for the construction of other buildings. The Legacy Center's precedent-setting aspects include the rigorous analysis of its energy use and carbon footprint, its innovative approach to natural ventilation, its extensive use of locally harvested and recycled-content materials, and its small overall ecological footprint.

The process of creating the Leopold Legacy Center was ultimately about finding real solutions to large-scale problems, about finding hope and a larger sense of community, and about demonstrating what it means to live on a piece of land without spoiling it.

Learn More

It is possible to visit this project and tours are available. The Aldo Leopold Legacy Center is located at E13701 Levee Road, about 15 minutes northeast of Baraboo, Wisconsin.

Jennifer Kobylecky (Tour Contact) Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc. Baraboo, WI  53913 608-355-0279 [](
  • Web sites

    • Aldo Leopold Foundation
      This is the main website for the Aldo Leopold Foundation. It includes extensive information about Aldo Leopold himself as well as the Foundation and the Legacy Center.

*Primary Contact* Wayne Reckard The Kubala Washatko Architects, Inc. Director of marketing W61 N617 Mequon Avenue Cedarburg, WI  53012 262-377-6039 [](
Buddy Huffaker The Aldo Leopold Foundation, Inc. Owner/developer (Executive director) E13701 Levee Road P.O. Box 77 Baraboo, WI  53913-077 608-355-0279 [](